ABSTRACT
Background@#Optimal antiplatelet strategy for patients with ischemic stroke who were already on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different antiplatelet regimens on vascular and safety outcomes at 1 year after non-cardioembolic stroke in patients previously on SAPT. @*Methods@#We identified 9,284 patients with acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke that occurred on SAPT using linked data. Patients were categorized into three groups according to antiplatelet strategy at discharge: 1) SAPT; 2) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); and 3) triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT). One-year outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke, composite outcomes (recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, and death), and major bleeding. @*Results@#Of 9,284 patients, 5,565 (59.9%) maintained SAPT, 3,638 (39.2%) were treated with DAPT, and 81 (0.9%) were treated with TAPT. Multiple antiplatelet therapy did not reduce the risks of 1-year recurrent stroke (DAPT, hazard ratio [HR], 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–1.27, P = 0.339; TAPT, HR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.27–1.91, P = 0.500) and 1-year composite outcome (DAPT, HR, 1.09, 95% CI, 0.68–1.97, P = 0.592; TAPT, HR, 1.46, 95% CI, 0.68–1.97, P = 0.592). However, the TAPT groups showed an increased risk of major bleeding complications (DAPT, HR, 1.23, 95% CI, 0.89–1.71, P = 0.208; TAPT, HR, 4.65, 95% CI, 2.01–10.74, P < 0.001). @*Conclusion@#Additional use of antiplatelet agents in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke who were already on SAPT did not reduce the 1-year incidence of vascular outcomes, although it increased the risk of bleeding complications.
ABSTRACT
Brain edema is a well-recognized pathophysiological secondary change after primary brain injury. The mechanism of brain edema may differ based on the types of brain edema. However, numerous ion channels are involved in its development and are therefore currently a hot target for anti-edema therapy. Here, this paper reviews the clinically important differences among the types of brain edema and a step-wise management strategy for brain edema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP).Current Concepts: Brain edema can be classified as cytotoxic, ionic, vasogenic, and interstitial edema. Although the underlying mechanisms may differ among the various types of brain edema, multiple ion channels and the integrity of tight junctions are associated with the development of brain edema. If brain edema aggravates, the intracranial volume expands and leads to an elevation of ICP. A basic principle in the management of ICP includes proper positioning, screening for a need for extraventricular drainage, proper sedation, transient hyperventilation, assessing the intracranial water status with the serum sodium level, optimization of cerebral perfusion pressure, hyperosmolar therapy, targeted temperature management, and induction of a pharmacological coma with sedatives.Discussion and Conclusion: Stepwise treatment strategies are recommended in the management of patients with ICP crisis. Based on the principle, detailed management plans need to be adjusted based on the status of an individual patient.
ABSTRACT
Monitoring and managing elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is one of the core topics in neurocritical care. Although invasive methods are regarded as standard means, the recent development of non-invasive monitoring devices help clinicians handle ICP issues without additional risks of device-related complications.Current Concepts: According to the Monro–Kellie hypothesis, any brain injury that can cause a mass effect will lead to ICP elevation. Therefore, an ICP surge beyond the capacity of a compensatory reserve will decrease cerebral blood flow and may end up causing secondary brain damage. Indications for invasive ICP monitoring may vary according to the underlying conditions or the severity of brain damage. Regardless, ICP monitoring is considered when there is a risk of ICP elevation. In addition to pressure monitoring, external ventricular drainage catheters are used therapeutically to drain cerebrospinal fluid to reduce ICP. Several ICP monitoring probes are available based on pressure measurement types. Recently, non-invasive ICP monitoring methods have been developed and are increasingly used in patients with severe brain injuries. Pulsatility index from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, quantitative pupillary light reflex from an automated pupillometer, and optic nerve sheath diameter using ultrasonography are commonly used surrogates for ICP surges in neurointensive care units.Discussion and Conclusion: ICP monitoring is essential for managing patients with severe brain injuries. Understanding the differences among the ICP monitors and determining the appropriate methods for ICP monitoring is necessary for optimizing patients’ care in the neurocritical care unit.
ABSTRACT
Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is a pathological condition associated with severe neurological conditions in patients with acute brain injuries. Managing increased ICP based on optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is crucial for improving outcomes.Current Concepts: Cerebral autoregulation, the intrinsic ability to maintain stable cerebral blood flow across a wide range of CPP, is impaired in several brain injuries. CPP, the difference between the mean arterial pressure and the ICP, is a critical factor in maintaining cerebral blood flow. Therefore, optimal CPP is important in managing patients with acute brain injuries. In addition, monitoring cerebral autoregulation and its response to pathological derangements can help diagnose, manage, and predict acute brain injury outcomes. Goal-directed therapy using cerebral autoregulation is beneficial in managing patients with ICP elevation. If blood pressure is excessively low in a patient with elevated intracranial pressure, a treatment to increase blood pressure should be considered as a first step, called optimizing cerebral perfusion pressure. However, if CPP is excessively high in a patient with elevated ICP, a treatment to lower CPP by controlling blood pressure to an appropriate level to prevent worsening of edema due to hyperperfusion should be considered.Discussion and Conclusion: Monitoring cerebral autoregulation to guide optimal management of increased ICP based on optimal CPP may be helpful in goal-directed therapy and improving prognosis among patients with acute brain injuries.
ABSTRACT
Hyperosmolar therapy is an essential treatment method for increased intracranial pressure and cerebral edema. Mannitol and hypertonic saline are frequently used in clinical practice; however, more helpful recommendations are needed for the optimal management of cerebral edema in terms of the choice, dosage, and timing of these medications. This study aimed to introduce the characteristics and relative strengths of two agents, i.e., mannitol and hypertonic saline, and review clinical data supporting their use in various diseases.Current Concepts: Hyperosmolar therapy reduces intracranial pressure by removing water from the brain tissue and transferring it to the vascular space by creating an osmotic gradient. Mannitol improves cerebral blood flow by reducing the hematocrit, decreasing blood viscosity, and increasing deformability of red blood cells. Hypertonic saline increases intravascular volume, transiently increases cardiac output, and improves tissue oxygen partial pressure in the brain. Hypertonic saline has several advantages over mannitol, including quicker onset and longer-lasting reduction in intracranial pressure. However, no significant differences are noted in clinical, functional outcomes, or mortality between the two treatment agents.Discussion and Conclusion: Both mannitol and hypertonic saline are effective in reducing increased intracranial pressure. Clinicians should be able to select an appropriate agent in different clinical situations based on available evidence and patients’ individual medical conditions.
ABSTRACT
Mannitol and hypertonic saline are the most frequently used hyperosmolar agents to treat cerebral edema resulting from acute brain injury. However, there are several issues with using hyperosmolar therapies. Here, we focus on the potential adverse effects of hyperosmolar therapies and practical tips to overcome these issues in the neurointensive care unit.Current Concepts: Among the hyperosmolar agents used, mannitol may decrease intravascular volume and pose a potential risk of acute kidney injury for patients. Complications associated with using hypertonic saline include the risk of central pontine myelinolysis, coagulopathy, electrolyte imbalances, metabolic acidosis, and pulmonary edema. In addition, prolonged use of hypertonic saline increases the risk of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, which may be overcome with the concomitant use of sodium acetate.Discussion and Conclusion: Several laboratory variables were monitored in the neurointensive care unit to limit and possibly detect early complications related to hyperosmolar therapies. When using hyperosmolar agents, including mannitol and hypertonic saline, for therapeutic purposes in patients with cerebral edema, determining whether to use peripheral or central lines and determining the appropriate rate and infusion dose can minimize their adverse effects. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential adverse events of administering hyperosmolar agents.
ABSTRACT
Targeted temperature management is a treatment strategy to lower core body temperature to achieve neuroprotection or reduce elevated intracranial pressure. Therefore, it has been increasingly used in the neurointensive care unit to manage various types of acute neurologic injuries.Current Concepts: Targeted temperature management can be divided into three distinct phases, including induction, maintenance, and rewarming, and each phase has risks and predictable complications. In patients with acute neurocritical illnesses, including traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke, brain edema is a potentially life-threatening complication as it raises the intracranial pressure, leading to brain herniation and permanent neurological damage. In this sense, targeted temperature management can be considered the final strategy for medical treatment for controlling an intracranial pressure crisis in patients with severe brain injury.Discussion and Conclusion: In the neurointensive care unit, applying targeted temperature management to patients with severe brain injuries may be challenging. Targeted temperature management in critically ill neurological patients is associated with an increased risk of systemic complications, as hypothermia is prolonged, requiring a comprehensive patient-by-patient assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of treatment. Except for cerebral pressure management, analyses of targeted temperature management in patients with traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage remain controversial regarding its effect on prognosis. Targeted temperature management should be reserved for selective patients, and further studies are needed to improve the efficacy of hypothermia for individual conditions, including intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke.
ABSTRACT
Antithrombotic therapy is a cornerstone of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management and secondary stroke prevention. Since the first version of the Korean Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for stroke was issued in 2009, significant progress has been made in antithrombotic therapy for patients with AIS, including dual antiplatelet therapy in acute minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic stroke and early oral anticoagulation in AIS with atrial fibrillation. The evidence is widely accepted by stroke experts and has changed clinical practice. Accordingly, the CPG Committee of the Korean Stroke Society (KSS) decided to update the Korean Stroke CPG for antithrombotic therapy for AIS. The writing members of the CPG committee of the KSS reviewed recent evidence, including clinical trials and relevant literature, and revised recommendations. A total of 35 experts were invited from the KSS to reach a consensus on the revised recommendations. The current guideline update aims to assist healthcare providers in making well-informed decisions and improving the quality of acute stroke care. However, the ultimate treatment decision should be made using a holistic approach, considering the specific medical conditions of individual patients.
ABSTRACT
Background@#and PurposeAcute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a common but understudied complication in neurocritically ill patients. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine can be used to treat ACPO in patients who do not respond to conventional treatment. This study investigated the effectiveness and adverse events when using neostigmine to manage ACPO in neurocritically ill patients. @*Methods@#This retrospective study investigated patients with ACPO who were treated using neostigmine in the neurological intensive-care units at two centers between March 2017 and August 2020. Neostigmine was administered intravenously or subcutaneously (at doses ranging from 0.25 mg to 2 mg) according to the protocols at the two centers. The outcomes were bowel movements and the changes in colon diameters on abdominal radiographs. Safety events such as bradycardia, vomiting, salivation, and sweating were evaluated. @*Results@#This study included 31 subjects with a mean age of 46.8 years (65.4% males). All patients had a bowel movement at a median of 120 minutes after administering neostigmine. The colon diameter decreased by a median of 17.5 mm (paired t-test: p<0.001) regardless of the dose and treatment protocols. Multilevel analysis confirmed that the mean colon diameter decreased from 66 mm pretreatment to 47.5 mm posttreatment (p<0.001), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 13%. Three patients (9.7%) exhibited hypersalivation, sweating, bradycardia, and vomiting. Bradycardia (heart rate, 42 beats/minute) occurred in one patient (3.2%), and was successfully managed by injecting atropine. @*Conclusions@#Neostigmine injection is a safe and effective treatment option for ACPO in neurocritically ill patients who fail to respond to conservative management.
ABSTRACT
Background@#and PurposeAcute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a common but understudied complication in neurocritically ill patients. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine can be used to treat ACPO in patients who do not respond to conventional treatment. This study investigated the effectiveness and adverse events when using neostigmine to manage ACPO in neurocritically ill patients. @*Methods@#This retrospective study investigated patients with ACPO who were treated using neostigmine in the neurological intensive-care units at two centers between March 2017 and August 2020. Neostigmine was administered intravenously or subcutaneously (at doses ranging from 0.25 mg to 2 mg) according to the protocols at the two centers. The outcomes were bowel movements and the changes in colon diameters on abdominal radiographs. Safety events such as bradycardia, vomiting, salivation, and sweating were evaluated. @*Results@#This study included 31 subjects with a mean age of 46.8 years (65.4% males). All patients had a bowel movement at a median of 120 minutes after administering neostigmine. The colon diameter decreased by a median of 17.5 mm (paired t-test: p<0.001) regardless of the dose and treatment protocols. Multilevel analysis confirmed that the mean colon diameter decreased from 66 mm pretreatment to 47.5 mm posttreatment (p<0.001), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 13%. Three patients (9.7%) exhibited hypersalivation, sweating, bradycardia, and vomiting. Bradycardia (heart rate, 42 beats/minute) occurred in one patient (3.2%), and was successfully managed by injecting atropine. @*Conclusions@#Neostigmine injection is a safe and effective treatment option for ACPO in neurocritically ill patients who fail to respond to conservative management.
ABSTRACT
Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset since the five landmark ERT trials up to 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thorough reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make their well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Hydroxyethyl starch (HES, 6% 130/0.4) has been used as a volume expander for the treatment of cerebral hypoperfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Although HES use was associated with renal failure in sepsis or critical illness, it still remains to be elucidated whether HES is linked to renal adverse events in patients with acute ischemic stroke. @*Methods@#A total of 524 patients with acute ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset were included between January 2012 and May 2016. Renal function on admission and follow-up on day 7 ± 2 was assessed using serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to perform a 1:1 matched-pair analysis to minimize the group differences caused by covariates. The percentage of patients with newonset acute renal injury (AKI) using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes or good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) at 90 days were compared between HES cohort and controls. @*Results@#Among the included patients (mean age, 68.6 years; male, 56.5%), 81 patients (15.5%) were HES cohort (median cumulative dose, 1,450 mL). Baseline renal function was better in HES cohort compared to that in the controls (SCr, 0.87 ± 0.43 mg/dL vs. 1.15 ± 1.15 mg/dL, P < 0.001; eGFR, 86.91 ± 24.27 mL/min vs. 74.55 ± 29.58 mL/min, P < 0.001), which became not significant in PSM cohort (72 pairs). The percentage of new-onset AKI did not differ between the HES cohort and controls (1.4% vs. 1.4%, P = 1.000). In addition, newonset AKI was not related to HES (odds ratio, 1.422; 95% confidence interval, 0.072–28.068; P = 0.817) after adjusting for confounders. HES cohort tended to have higher percentage of good functional outcome at 90 days compared to controls, which failed to reach statistical significance (68.1% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.087). @*Conclusion@#A low cumulative dose of HES was not associated with renal adverse events in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Neurocritical care by dedicated neurointensivists may improve outcomes of critically ill patients with severe brain injury. In this study, we aimed to validate whether neurointensive care could improve the outcome in patients with critically ill acute ischemic stroke using the linked big dataset on stroke in Korea. @*Methods@#We included 1,405 acute ischemic stroke patients with mechanical ventilator support in the intensive care unit after an index stroke. Patients were retrieved from linking the Clinical Research Center for Stroke Registry and the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data from the period between January 2007 and December 2014. The outcomes were mortality at discharge and at 3 months after an index stroke. The main outcomes were compared between the centers with and without dedicated neurointensivists. @*Results@#Among the included patients, 303 (21.6%) were admitted to the centers with dedicated neurointensivists. The patients treated by dedicated neurointensivists had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (18.3% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.002) as well as lower mortality at 3-month (38.0% vs. 49.1%, P < 0.001) than those who were treated without neurointensivists. After adjusting for confounders, a treatment without neurointensivists was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.13–2.25; P = 0.008) and 3-month mortality (OR, 1.48; 95% CIs, 1.12–1.95; P = 0.005). @*Conclusion@#Treatment by dedicated neurointensivists is associated with lower in-hospital and 3-month mortality using the linked big datasets for stroke in Korea. This finding stresses the importance of neurointensivists in treating patients with severe ischemic stroke.
ABSTRACT
Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arteries , Caregivers , Cerebral Infarction , Consensus , Health Personnel , Korea , Mechanical Thrombolysis , Reperfusion , Standard of Care , Stroke , WritingABSTRACT
Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
Subject(s)
Humans , Arteries , Caregivers , Cerebral Infarction , Consensus , Health Personnel , Korea , Mechanical Thrombolysis , Reperfusion , Standard of Care , Stroke , WritingABSTRACT
Although perioperative stroke is uncommon during low-risk non-vascular surgery, if it occurs, it can negatively impact recovery from the surgery and functional outcome. Based on the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Consensus Statement, perioperative stroke includes intraoperative stroke, as well as postoperative stroke developing within 30 days after surgery. Factors related to perioperative stroke include age, sex, a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, cardiac surgery (aortic surgery, mitral valve surgery, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery), and neurosurgery (external carotid-internal carotid bypass surgery, carotid endarterectomy, or aneurysm clipping). Concomitant carotid and cardiac surgery may further increase the risk of perioperative stroke. Preventive strategies should be individualized based on patient factors, including cerebrovascular reserve capacity and the time interval since the previous stroke.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Linkage of public healthcare data is useful in stroke research because patients may visit different sectors of the health system before, during, and after stroke. Therefore, we aimed to establish high-quality big data on stroke in Korea by linking acute stroke registry and national health claim databases. METHODS: Acute stroke patients (n = 65,311) with claim data suitable for linkage were included in the Clinical Research Center for Stroke (CRCS) registry during 2006–2014. We linked the CRCS registry with national health claim databases in the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). Linkage was performed using 6 common variables: birth date, gender, provider identification, receiving year and number, and statement serial number in the benefit claim statement. For matched records, linkage accuracy was evaluated using differences between hospital visiting date in the CRCS registry and the commencement date for health insurance care in HIRA. RESULTS: Of 65,311 CRCS cases, 64,634 were matched to HIRA cases (match rate, 99.0%). The proportion of true matches was 94.4% (n = 61,017) in the matched data. Among true matches (mean age 66.4 years; men 58.4%), the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 3 (interquartile range 1–7). When comparing baseline characteristics between true matches and false matches, no substantial difference was observed for any variable. CONCLUSION: We could establish big data on stroke by linking CRCS registry and HIRA records, using claims data without personal identifiers. We plan to conduct national stroke research and improve stroke care using the linked big database.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Delivery of Health Care , Information Storage and Retrieval , Insurance, Health , Korea , National Health Programs , Parturition , StrokeABSTRACT
Although perioperative stroke is uncommon during low-risk non-vascular surgery, if it occurs, it can negatively impact recovery from the surgery and functional outcome. Based on the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care Consensus Statement, perioperative stroke includes intraoperative stroke, as well as postoperative stroke developing within 30 days after surgery. Factors related to perioperative stroke include age, sex, a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, cardiac surgery (aortic surgery, mitral valve surgery, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery), and neurosurgery (external carotid-internal carotid bypass surgery, carotid endarterectomy, or aneurysm clipping). Concomitant carotid and cardiac surgery may further increase the risk of perioperative stroke. Preventive strategies should be individualized based on patient factors, including cerebrovascular reserve capacity and the time interval since the previous stroke.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesiology , Aneurysm , Consensus , Coronary Artery Bypass , Critical Care , Embolism , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Hemorrhage , Ischemia , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Mitral Valve , Neurosciences , Neurosurgery , Stroke , Thoracic Surgery , TransplantsABSTRACT
Metronidazole is a widely used antibiotic for the treatment of anaerobic bacterial infections. Metronidazole-induced encephalopathy (MIEP) is a rare but potentially reversible disease. The mechanism of MIEP remains unclear, and differences in the neurotoxic effects of oral versus intravenous (IV) metronidazole administration have not yet been determined. We report the case of a Crohn's disease (CD) patient who experienced encephalopathy immediately after a single IV dose of metronidazole following long-term exposure to the oral form of the drug. The 64-year-old man with intractable CD experienced a sudden change in mental status, aphasia, and muscle weakness after IV administration of metronidazole. He had previously taken metronidazole orally for 13 years and received intermittent IV metronidazole treatments for CD exacerbation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed high-intensity signals in the bilateral medial thalamus and the midbrain and pontine tegmentum on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. After discontinuation of metronidazole, the high-intensity brain MRI signals resolved and the patient's mental status dramatically improved; however, the patient exhibited mild cognitive dysfunction 2 months after the onset of encephalopathy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Aphasia , Bacterial Infections , Brain , Brain Diseases , Brain Diseases, Metabolic , Crohn Disease , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mesencephalon , Metronidazole , Muscle Weakness , Pontine Tegmentum , ThalamusABSTRACT
Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is often accompanied by a myriad of neurologic complications, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although appropriate neuromonitoring is recommended for early diagnosis and to minimize secondary brain injury, individuals with FHF usually have a high chance of coagulopathy, which limits the ability to use invasive neuromonitoring. Jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation (JvO₂) monitoring is well known as a surrogate direct measures of global brain oxygen use. We report the case of a patient with increased intracranial pressure due to FHF, in which JvO₂ was used for appropriate brain oxygen monitoring.